Toward a Methodology for Geopolitical Analysis

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52781/cmm.a215

Palavras-chave:

Strategic Intelligence, budgetary planning, Geopolitical Analysis, Geoeconomics

Resumo

A geopolítica, historicamente disputada entre o determinismo clássico e a teoria crítica, exige uma abordagem analítica rigorosa e sistemática para que possa produzir resultados relevantes para a formulação de políticas públicas. Este texto propõe uma metodologia estruturada de análise geopolítica, fundamentada na literatura clássica e contemporânea, delineando as etapas essenciais, as ferramentas analíticas e as competências centrais que um analista geopolítico deve dominar. Com base em autores que vão de Halford Mackinder e Nicholas Spykman a Klaus Dodds e Colin Gray, as proposições aqui apresentadas tratam a investigação geopolítica como um processo iterativo que integra raciocínio espacial, análise histórica, mapeamento da distribuição do poder, avaliação geoeconômica e desenvolvimento estruturado de cenários. O arcabouço metodológico também aborda os desafios cognitivos e epistemológicos inerentes à análise geopolítica, incluindo o efeito de espelhamento (mirror-imaging), o viés de confirmação e a interpretação equivocada de mudanças estruturais. Exemplos práticos extraídos da competição estratégica no Indo-Pacífico, da arquitetura de segurança europeia, da guerra na Ucrânia e do ataque do Hamas de 7 de outubro de 2023 ilustram cada uma das etapas metodológicas. O artigo conclui apresentando um conjunto de competências fundamentais — espaciais, históricas, quantitativas e relacionadas às técnicas profissionais de análise (tradecraft) — que definem a prática profissional da análise geopolítica no século XXI.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Vinicius Mariano de Carvalho, Kings College London London, United Kingdom.

Dr Vinicius Mariano de Carvalho was born in Barra Mansa, Brazil. He received his PhD from the University of Passau, Germany, and his undergraduate and MA degrees from the Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Brazil.

He joined King’s in 2014 and before he was Associate Professor for Brazilian Studies at Aarhus University (2008-2014), Denmark, where he was also Director of the Latin American Centre (2012-2014).  Vinicius was a Lieutenant in the Brazilian Army (2007-2008), serving in the Military Technical Corps.

At King’s, Vinicius has served as a Vice Dean (International) for the Faculty of Social Science & Public Policy, and director of King’s Brazil Institute between 2020 and 2022. At the War Studies Department, he is the Convener of the MA in Strategic Communications and teaches UG modules on Latin America issues.

Vinicius is the Circle U. Academic Chair Programme Coordinator. He has played an active role contributing to the field of Brazilian studies, founding and editing Brasiliana – Journal for Brazilian Studies and as Editor of the Anthem Brazilian Studies Series.

In 2022, Vinicius created the Observatory of Democracy in Latin America (KODLA). He is also an Associate Researcher at the Centre for Strategic Studies of the Brazilian Navy. Parallel to his academic career,  Vinicius is a music conductor and currently directs the King’s Brazil Ensemble.

 - https://www.kcl.ac.uk/people/vinicius-de-carvalho

Referências

AGNEW, J. Geopolitics: re-visioning world politics. London: Routledge, 1998.

ALLISON, G. Destined for war: can America and China escape thucydides’s trap? Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2017.

BEACH, D.; PEDERSEN, R. B. Process-tracing methods: foundations and guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2013.

ccessed on: Oct 20 2026.

BLACKWILL, R. D.; HARRIS, J. M. War by Other means: geoeconomics and statecraft. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2016.

BRANDS, H.; BECKLEY, M. Danger zone: the coming conflict with China. New York: W. W. Norton, 2022.

BRAUDEL, F. The mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the age of Philip II. London: Collins, 1972.

BRZEZINSKI, Z. The grand chessboard: American primacy and its geostrategic imperatives. New York: Basic Books, 1997.

BYMAN, D. A war they both are losing: Israel, Hamas and the plight of Gaza. Survival, v. 66, n. 3, p. 61-78, 2024.

CARVALHO, V. M. The Era of Surrealpolitik. King’s College London, London, Feb 9 2026. Available at: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/the-era-of-surrealpolitik. Accessed on: Oct 20 2026.

CLAUSEWITZ, C. von. On war. Edited and translated by M. Howard and P. Paret. Princeton: Princeton University Press, [1832] 1989.

DODDS, K. Geopolitics: a very short introduction. 3. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.

FARRELL, H.; NEWMAN, A. L. Weaponized interdependence: how global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security, v. 44, n. 1, p. 42-79, 2019.

FRAVEL, M. T. Active defense: China’s military strategy since 1949. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.

GEORGE, A. L.; BENNETT, A. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.

GERMOND, B. The maritime dimension of European security: seapower and the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.

GRAY, C. S. Modern strategy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

GRAY, C. S. The future of strategy. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2015.

HEUER, R. J.; PHERSON, R. H. Structured analytic techniques for intelligence analysis. 2. ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2014.

JOHNSTON, A. I. Cultural realism: strategic culture and grand strategy in Chinese history. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.

KAHNEMAN, D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.

KAPLAN, R. D. The revenge of geography: what the map tells us about coming conflicts and the battle against fate. New York: Random House, 2012.

KENNEDY, P. The rise and fall of the great powers: economic change and military conflict from 1500 to 2000. London: Unwin Hyman, 1988.

KENT, S. Words of estimative probability. Studies in Intelligence, v. 8, n. 4, p. 49-65, 1964. KISSINGER, H. Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994.

MACKINDER, H. J. The geographical pivot of history. The Geographical Journal, v. 23, n. 4, p. 421-437, 1904.

MAHAN, A. T. The influence of sea power upon history, 1660–1783. Boston: Little, Brown, 1890.

MEARSHEIMER, J. J. The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W. W. Norton, 2001. MONMONIER, M. How to Lie with Maps. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.

MORGENTHAU, H. J. Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1948.

NYE, J. S. Soft power: the means to success in world politics. New York: PublicAffairs, 2004.

Ó TUATHAIL, G.; AGNEW, J. Geopolitics and discourse: practical geopolitical reasoning in American foreign policy. Political Geography, v. 11, n. 2, p. 190-204, 1992.

PILLAR, P. R. Intelligence and U.S. foreign policy: Iraq, 9/11, and Misguided reform. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.

PUTNAM, R. D. Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. International Organization, v. 42, n. 3, p. 427-460, 1988.

SPYKMAN, N. J. The geography of the peace. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1944.

STENT, A. Russia and Eurasia. Survival, v. 65, n. 4, p. 194-200, 2023.

STRANGE, S. States and markets. 2. ed. London: Pinter Publishers, 1994.

TALEB, N. N. The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable. New York: Random House, 2007.

WALTZ, K. N. Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979.

ZEIHAN, P. The end of the world is just the beginning: mapping the collapse of globalization. New York: Harper Business, 2022.

Downloads

Publicado

03-11-2026

Como Citar

CARVALHO, Vinicius Mariano de. Toward a Methodology for Geopolitical Analysis. Coleção Meira Mattos, [S. l.], v. 20, n. 69, p. 1–16, 2026. DOI: 10.52781/cmm.a215. Disponível em: https://colecaomeiramattos.com.br/CMM/article/view/14307. Acesso em: 3 nov. 2026.